Re: Why is it that henna not prescribed for men?
[ Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ The Henna Page Forum ] [ FAQ ]
Posted by Babaganooj on May 11, 2000 at 16:02:20:
In Reply to: Re: Why is it that henna not prescribed for men? posted by Catherine Cartwright Jones on May 11, 2000 at 06:31:49:
I really do thank the great feedback I got about this topic in fact, it didn't only satisfy my curiosity, it was enlightening as well. I knew from my background that dying hair for men is not frowned upon as long as a piece of the hair that does reflect its authentic color is left undyed. That dying of the hair, I believe, was not achieved through the use of henna. Rather by other substances. Now with the feedback I got, I sort of understand why henna for men was frowned upon. Gender identification plus bad associations with painful memories. As children, though, up to the age of 9 or ten, I remember having attended a wedding party at a rural village near my urban hometown in Syria. As kids, part of the festivities included hennaying the hands of kids (the palms) I still recall how my classmates in the urban settings made fun of that until the henna disappeared. However, once men reach adulthood even in rural settings, henna even in erddings is frowned upon for men. It really boils down to what you mentioned earlier regarding gender identification as a main motive. Now the same principle can be applied to wearing gold for men. In my culture, and in Islamic tradition in general, men waering gold is frowned upon. What is intersting, though, is men wearing white gold is not as bad. Silver seems to be the preferred metal for wedding bands, etc.... Again thanks for your input on the matter. Babaganooj : In India, certainly prior to 1500 CE, henna was used about equally : between both men and women, and didn't seem to have any particularly : strong ties to a belief system. India seems to have had a separate and : parallel origin of henna to the the Middle East.
: However... traditions stemming from the Middle East were entirely : different. : Prior to 550 CE in the Middle East, men certainly used henna as a : symbol of valour when going into battle, and to a certain extent up to : the 19th century as a battle marker. But even in the Bronze Age, : henna was more commonly used by women than men. In the earliest : period, 7000 BCE to 550 CE, henna was associated with the belief : system surrounding the Virgin Warrior goddess (going by several names : including Anath, Tanith, and Inanna) and the Fertility goddess : (several variations again, Asherah, Astarte, Ishtar). Women used : henna as part of the years cycle of religious festivals, and as part : of their bridal preparations within these religions. Those religions : and the civilizations that supported them were largely gone by the : rise of the Roman Empire, though henna was still certainly used in the : Middle East through that period. : When Islam rose (partly due to the economic collapse following the : Roman Empire) the Prophet Mohammed specified (or is alleged to have : specified) that henna primarilly be used by women as a part of gender : identification (to more easily separate the sexes). As Islamic : society pushed the sexes grew more towards a complete apartheid, : gender identity in body markings became extremely important. Men who : used henna at times other than at specific festivals and just a bit at : their wedding were viewed as insufficiently masculine. Certainly, the : fact that there was often a male prostitute class (who cross dressed : and hennaed) in many of the urban capitals of the medieval Islamic : world must have contributed to the sense that a "manly man" shouldn't : wear henna. : I also suspect that the event of pre-adolescent circumcision (at 9 - : 13 years old), when a boy was hennaed like a bride just prior to : excruciating pain, may have played a strong role in men's intense : unwillingness to wear henna (really, really bad associative memories).
Follow Ups:
|