![]() |
tacticsPosted by Catherine Cartwright Jones on August 19, 2001 at 01:53:42: In reply to: Thank You posted by Natalie on August 19, 2001 at 00:10:26: I do think the approach to take is:Leave the old regs as they were, and enforce them: pure henna is ok, (neither approved nor prohibited). People's rights to their social celebrations of religious holidays must be protected, therefore, henna must be protected. Adulterated henna MUST be siezed and comfiscated to protect public health. This rant is going to take absolutely ALL the scholarship I have to press the point. Anyone who can email me (privately, please) links to Muslim and Hindu sites that detail celebrational use of henna ....please do so, so I can make the "religious freedom" and "preservation of cultural diversity" cases as strong as possible. If I can make the point that henna is to marriages what Christmas trees are to Christmas ... things will move right along. Also, can someone find me statistics on the numbers of Muslim and Hindu voters across the US? One of the reasons I'm not in a rush to press the FDA to APPROVE henna is that that may be damn near impossible, and very expensive. And if it is approved, the large cosmetic companies will sieze henna art and exploit it for their own profit! I'd like to see it stay an art for ethnics, historical enthusiasts and individual artists! That's going to be my tactic .... keep it simple, keep it in the hands of people who genuinely love and appreciate it. Neither hand it over to industry, nor forbid it. When the rant is done, I'll get it PDF'd, printable, emailable ... every way possible to make it easy for YOU get it into the hands of your government representative and all. You DO vote, right?????
Follow Ups
|
![]() |
Post Followup | |
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |