Re: Tattoo rant..Posted by Denise on May 3, 2001 at 12:38:03: In reply to: Re: A fad for the Millenia posted by Willowhawk on May 3, 2001 at 06:24:47: : That is such an ignorant statement from him, if you will forgive me: for saying so. I have 8 tattoo's and even though a few are quite : small, it would have been quicker to do them as Mehendi than : permanant ink and needle. I quite agree. I have 2 rather large ones, a ankh with a scarab on my shoulder, and a wolf with beaded indian feather on my ankle. (Have you noticed most of us have permanant tattoos but choose to do henna?) While I was getting my wolf done in the shop the guy and his assistant was inquiring about my henna that covered my hand. The assistant called "it sexy as hell for women to henna their hands." Then here comes one of the other tattooist and starts trashing henna. One of the comments was "You still do that? I thought that died out years ago. And it has to sit on there forever." Argh....Meanwhile I'm in the middle of a 3 hour tat. Let's see 3 hour pain or 6 of henna painfree. Go fig which is better..I guess some think just because they permantly mark someone they're superior but every time one makes the comment on it being a fad. I just remember I'm not inflicting pain and permanace. I HAVE a artistic ability, and henna will probably outlast the tattoo fad! HUMPH.. I think I'm done for now.
Follow Ups
|
Post Followup | ||
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |